“There is so much talk of an Indian agreement on frescoes in India… I am very confident that this government will not pursue the kind of models that the United States is following. The LSU is not opposed to international trade agreements. But it should be in the best interest of the country,” he said. Third, after the revision, the global trade order will most likely be influenced by geopolitical decisions. Many countries are now cautious about China and can strategically orient themselves to other trading partners for imports. India has a good chance in this area and should fill this gap by building its champion sectors with immediate urgency. India can use indications from Vietnam and Bangladesh that make it extraordinarily good, as well as alternative targets for companies that relocate their production out of China. Existing and newly signed free trade agreements should take this trend into account and allow for some economic concessions instead of strategic ones. Political decisions often involve trade-offs between the economy and politics, and the choice of the right compromise is essential.
An interactive list of bilateral and multilateral free trade instruments can be find on the TREND Analytics website.  The Minister assured that India would benefit greatly from the trade agreement and that the United States would also benefit from its corresponding share of the benefits. Goyal also assured that India would always protect its agriculture, dairy, MSMEs and local industry and “make a balanced (commercial) agreement. However, in this context, exacerbated by the fact that most countries are cautiously following their trade strategy, India must focus on far-reaching free trade agreements with trading partners that offer maximum trade complementarities, particularly in the United States and the EU. In the United States, our untapped export potential as a percentage of current exports is around 60%, compared to 90% for the EU. Vietnam, which is becoming a huge competition for many economies, has already signed a trade pact with the EU. Read also: Modi started as champion of free trade, but ends as a protectionist Eurasian Economic Union, composed of Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan, concluded the following free trade agreements, see below here. Note: Any customs union, every common market, any economic union, the Customs and Monetary Union and the Economic and Monetary Union are also a free trade area. The EU is India`s largest trading partner, accounting for 11.1% of India`s total trade, on an equal footing with the United States and China (10.7%) ».
We are confident that free trade agreements with the EU and the US will benefit India and that talks will resume,” said Gopal Krishna Agarwal, national spokesman for the Bharatiya Janata Party for Economic Affairs. “India is not opposed to trade agreements with other countries, although now, it seems, after the release of the RCEP, the popular idea is that we understand the need to remain integrated at the global and regional level,” Agarwal added. Over the past year, the LSU has played a key role in persuading the BJP-led government to end negotiations on the 16-member Comprehensive Regional Economic Partnership Agreement between 16 countries, including ASEAN, India and China, which has 10 members. Switzerland (which has a customs union with Liechtenstein, which is sometimes contained in agreements) has bilateral agreements with the following countries and blocs: Afghanistan has bilateral agreements with the following countries and blocs: This is a list of free trade agreements between two parties, in which each party could be a country (or another customs territory) , a trading bloc or an informal group of countries.